We'll see what works, where the differences are and pick out who each one is suited to. What we're going to do here is a walkthrough of both Robomongo and Studio 3T, connected to Compose MongoDB, with some real data imported and queries needed to be performed. With both desktop UIs under the same roof, the question we heard being asked was what's the difference between them and which one would we recommend. Although Robomongo has made a lot of progress since we reviewed it a few years ago, we decided to review some of the main differences between Robomongo 1.0 and Studio 3T so that you can decide which one will fit your development needs. Since the release of Robomongo 1.0 and its aquisition by Studio 3T (formerly MongoChef), we've been interested in looking at some of its developments and how Robomongo and Studio 3T compare. They then announced they'd been acquired by 3T, the maker of commercial MongoDB desktop formerly known as MongoChef and now known as Studio 3T. Since then, after stalling for a while, the developers pushed forward to get a version 1.0 out. One, Robomongo, we looked at it a few years back. While Compose has a useful web browser for MongoDB to complement the Mongo shell, there's a whole class of desktop tools which offer different ways to access MongoDB with a native experience. With two of the best known MongoDB desktop UI's now under one roof, we decided to take a look at who should be using either of them - and how well they work with Compose. Taking a Look at Robomongo and Studio 3T with Compose for MongoDB robomongo studio 3t mongodb Free 30 Day Trial
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |